| |
ColumnsRebuttal to post in Fidonews Echo Hello Warren, It's about time "we" (whoever "we" is) made these lost Nodes and Points aware of the Fidonews Echo. Let's get 'm in here. For my view... The Fidonews Echo is for discussing the articles in the Fidonews publication. The Fidonews Publication is for articles submitted by people in Fidonet (Sysops and Users). To put Echo content into the Fidonews Publication to be hashed in the Fidonews Echo is re-hashing the hash. If a topic is worth discussing in the Fidonews Echo, it should be an article in the Fidonews Publication first and submitted as such to the Editor. If an article is posted in the Fidonews Echo for publication in the Fidonews Publication, put it in there as an article, not quoted material unless it is a rebuttal of an article or post and designated as such with a request to publish the rebuttal in the Fidonews Publication. To use your logic in this... Since "most nodes that read Fidonews don't have the echo on their systems", maybe we should have a Fidonews "Early Edition" that is composed of all the posts in the Fidonews Echo. I really don't think this would work and it's a really bad idea in my view, but it would get the whole thread of the subjects being talked about in the Fidonews Echo to the ones that don't get the Fidonews Echo for one reason or another. Here's a point to consider: Are you, in reality, harming the Fidonews Publication by including posts from the Fidonews Echo? Just my $.02 You can send the change to me later. :-)
Thanks again Frank, for your article and astute insight to the
editor's biggest problem. Hope a few articles will arrive now
for publication. Ol' WDB's Column Before the IT, V., Commodore64, Amiga, AppleII, Mac or the Internet. I'm talking about hide-and-seek at dusk. Wax lips and mustaches! Later.... Watching Saturday morning cartoons... short commercials... Or back further, listening to Jim Braddock & Joe Lewis fight, the search for Wiley Post & Will Rogers plane crash, the derigible from Germany tragedy, Henry Aldrich, and Superman on the radio. When around the corner seemed far away, Jumping on the bed. Pillow fights.
Spinning around, getting dizzy and falling down was cause for giggles. The worst embarrassment was being picked last for a team. Remember when... There were only two types of sneakers for girls and boys: Keds & PF When a quarter was a decent allowance, and another quarter was a miracle. When milk went up a penny and everyone talked about it for weeks. When you'd reach into a muddy gutter for a penny. When you got your windshield cleaned, oil checked, and gas pumped,
without asking, for free, every time. And you didn't pay for air in
the tires. And you got trading stamps to boot! When nearly everyone's Mom was at home when the kids got there. When it was considered a great privilege to be taken out to dinner at a real restaurant with your parents. When girls neither dated nor kissed until late high school, if then. When all of your male teachers wore neckties and female teachers had their hair done. When any parent could discipline any kid, or feed him, or use him to carry groceries, and nobody - not even the kid, thought a thing of it. When they threatened to keep kids back a grade if they failed ..and did! When being sent to the principal's office was nothing compared to what awaited a misbehaving student when arriving home. Basically, we were in fear for our lives but it wasn't because of
drive-by shootings, drugs, gangs, etc. Didn't that feel good.. just to go back and say, Yeah, I remember that! Remember when............ Scrapes and bruises were kissed and made better. Older siblings were the worst tormentors, but also the fiercest protectors. If you can remember most or all of these, then you have LIVED!! Ol'WDB OPINION COLUMN I think that if the EDITor sees a thread being pursued here that seems appropriate for inclusion in the newsletter, that rather than include the entire thread, quoted, and requoted at that, that a proper method to follow would be to create an article which explains the general topic of the discussions, provide a general overview of the basic context of the responses pro and con to the initial discussion, possibly give an idea of, by the number of respondents to either side, which position seems to be the more popular one, maybe provide on or two quotes from either side that seem to be of extreme relevance to either position, leave it up to the reader to draw conclusions, and ask for any comments from readers to be submitted for review... when comments are submitted, again, don't publish every one, but rather only publish the responses most direct to the subject. Make it a DIGEST of all the input, not just an archive publication of the entire echo. That is just my opinion. Phil Good Idea Phil, a DIGEST type format would get around the critics to a degree on the quoting and requoting again by someone else, and sometimes a third time by a third party. That has bothered me in learning how to be a editor rather than being the author of books. In my manuscripts, I don't have this problem. I will work on that idea next week's issue. Thanks for the input, you and several others coming forward with pointers are extremely important to me and the Snooze. Ol'wdb |
|