| |
ColumnsThis Weeks Web Page Comment: What: JetSys - Home of JetMail, JetStat and other Atari FidoNet utilities Where: http://www.jetsys.de/ Going for it: This is one of those pages that explains itself well. Rather than boring you with an attempt on my part to describe the page, here it is; ---- Features included in JetMail:
There is a demo package available which includes JetMail (Version 1.01) and JetStat (Version 1.01) and a preliminary documentation in ASCII format (sorry, the doc's are only availabe in english language) together with sample message files for the internal areafix and filefix. If you want to run the JetMail internal message tracker you need to download the BTNC nodelist compiler and the Xvision browsing utility. JetMail is only a mail processor for FidoNet networks. You can't read or write net- or echomails with JetMail. I recommend LED for this purpose. Y2K fixed version 1.01 is now available. There is a problem with the
PureC library function strftime which expands %y to 10 instead of
00. This only effects the date in JetMail generated messages. For
LED you had to pick up another update file. If you're into the Atari computers, drop by this page. Regards, Frank, flv@texoma.net ECHO TALK Though the messages below were taken from the MODERATOR echo in response to Jim Hanoian, I thought they were applicable to all echoes and might be of interest to all FIDONEWS readers. ---------- JH> I signed up for this echo since I am a Fido Moderator. I was I dunno, Jim... maybe you were sold a bill of goods by someone... or maybe you talked with someone who genuinely believed that the echo did them a lot of good, and you took it as a warranty. My guess, though, is that you read the tag name "MODERATOR" from the echolist and thought it might be nice to interact with folks of the same interest. Am I correct in assuming that no one actually promised you anything to induce you to join the echo, and that the dissapointment is based on your own expectations? JH> Can you give me any good reason to keep reading this echo? I can't, and I don't know if anyone should be expected to. Don't get my wrong... you're welcome here. Well, I'm not the moderator or anyone official, but I think I can say that as one of the folks who speaks up in the echo from time to time. You see, this is just a gathering place of moderators - the moderators aren't required to show up and they're not required to offer anything inspirational. So what you get out of it is going to depend on what you put into it. If you're looking for good, strong arguements... pick a fight and see who will accomodate you. Heck, you can probably join one of the ongoing ones with no trouble :) If you're looking for inspiration, try saying something inspirational and see who joins you. If you're looking for tips and techniques, try offering your own or asking specifics. Try nudging the conversation along the lines you want to hear - otherwise there's no reason to keep reading :) ---------- JH> Can you give me any good reason to keep reading this echo? JH> hehe... I've learned to (a) resubmit before expired and (b) do it See ... just those things alone can outweigh all the other things (g). Reading some Fido echoes is very similar to copying morse code signals when the bands are filled with interference(QRM) and static(QRN). It's amazing, but if you really concentrate of the signal you want to hear, the other stuff doesn't seem nearly as loud. Thom LaCosta ---------- JH> Can you give me any good reason to keep reading this echo? When I joined in it was exactly what you describe in the first paragraph... and frequently it still is. The trick is to ask for advice on something moderation related and watch helpful people come out of the woodwork to assist. The folks doing most of the arguing do it everwhere, not just here, so it's not enough to leave one echo I'm afraid. I wonder if perhaps somewhere in the description of this echo the words "Warning - this is NOT the Supreme Court of FIDOnet." should appear. ! Origin: StormGate Aerie: FILK, BABYLON5 & SFFAN (1:102/524) |
|